![]() They also included automatically placed commercials, making them lucrative to their owners and YouTube. In order to capture search results and attract attention from users, their titles and descriptions featured the names of the fictional characters, as well as keywords such as "education", "learn colors", and "nursery rhymes". Despite YouTube's age restriction policies, these videos were sometimes tagged in such a way as to circumvent the inbuilt child safety algorithms, even ascended onto YouTube Kids, and became difficult to moderate due to the large scale of the platform. Most videos in this category were produced either with live action or inexpensive Flash animation, although a few channels used more elaborate techniques, such as claymation or computer-generated imagery. However, the Elsagate controversy also included channels, such as Toy Freaks, which featured or focused on real children instead of fictional characters, raising concern about possible child abuse. The term itself is a portmanteau of Disney's Elsa of Arendelle-known for frequently appearing in such videos-and "-gate", a suffix for scandals. These videos featured fictional characters from family-oriented media, sometimes via crossovers, used without legal permission. Videos under this classification presented content including graphic violence, sexual situations, fetishes, obscene language, drugs, alcohol, nudity, injections, disease, off-color humor, dangerous or upsetting situations and activities. Examples of the situations featured in such videos can be seen above, such as injections, mutilation, childbirth, urination, fellatio, and chemical burning.Įlsagate is a neologism referring to a controversy surrounding videos on YouTube and YouTube Kids that were categorized as "child-friendly", but contained themes that were deemed inappropriate for young children. Thumbnails of Elsagate content were often represented by recognizable, family-friendly characters performing child-inappropriate or otherwise disturbing actions, either through explicit depiction or implication. JSTOR ( July 2023) ( Learn how and when to remove this template message).Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources in this article. This article needs additional citations for verification.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |